Members of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology come from many different backgrounds and live and work all around the world. Here we highlight the life and work of one of our members so that you can get to know them better. Paleontologists that have been profiled in the past are also listed so that you can go back and get to know them as well: Past PaleoProfiles
![]() |
Profile posted: May 2007
Undergraduate education:
Colorado State University, 1970–1972; University of Alberta,
1974–1979. Honors in Geology and Zoology Programme; B.Sc.,
Zoology, Vertebrate Paleontology Lab
Postgraduate education:
“Federal Equivalent to Ph.D.” for Professional Experience,
per US OPM Section IV-A, 1997 [… but an earned Ph.D. was not
completed. I do not recommend this route — finish your
education!]
Current position: Museum Curator
(Paleontologist); Chief Paleontologist, John Day Fossil Beds National
Monument; Science Advisor, Pacific West Region, U.S. National Park
Service
How/when did you first become interested in
science/paleontology?
I collected cereal box dinosaurs! As early as I can remember, I was
always interested in a variety of scientific disciplines, especially
astronomy, paleontology, and the Cactacea (cactus plants).
![]() With volunteer Skylar Rickabaugh, examining Pleistocene strata at Joshua Tree National Park. Photo courtesy of Ted Fremd. |
What was your favorite subject in school?
I was fortunate to have an excellent Ph.D. researcher as a physics
instructor in high school, and became interested in astronomy at that
time. Looking at the night sky is looking into the past: light that has
been traveling to your eye for millions of years. In the same way,
looking at fossils is like looking into the past. However, my schools
did not offer a lot of coursework on biology and evolution. If they did,
I’m sure that those classes would have been my favorites, because
after many visits to the Denver Museum of Natural History in grade
school I was pretty hooked on paleo!
Do you do fieldwork? If so, how do you spend a typical day in the
field? The fun parts? The frustrations?
I do as much fieldwork as I can permit myself to do, but suffer from
guilt at being paid to do what I would do for fun. The wonderful part
about my position is I can and do fieldwork in a wide variety of
national park settings. My focus in the John Day Basin, located in the
frontier of Eastern Oregon, is to try to reconstruct the paleoecology
— the organismal and climate changes through time — by
applying a broad range of disciplines and relying heavily on the work of
many colleagues. Typically, I may spend a day looking for fossils
ranging in size from tiny seeds and teeth, to enormous petrified trees
and fossil mammals at one of over 750 localities we are managing east of
the Cascades. A certain group of mammals called brontotheres, are common
in this region of Oregon. The fun parts are finding new material in
previously unexplored sections and documenting them; the frustrations
include burning one’s hands on a black chisel left in the sun on a
110-degree day!
![]() Working with artists to make accurate models of extinct creatures for exhibits. Photo courtesy of Ted Fremd. |
How do you spend a typical day when you are not doing
fieldwork?
I am currently writing manuscripts, doing research, identifying
collected specimens, working on some popular books and exhibit texts,
supervising the other paleontological staff, serving on a few graduate
student committees, and dealing with a host of professional, curatorial,
and administrative tasks. Recent papers include descriptions of new
faunas from remote localities. I just finished supervising the
development and installation of the exhibits in the Thomas Condon
Paleontology Center, our new paleontology museum here in Oregon. Please
see the website for some photographs of our new displays.
What do you like best about your job? What excites you most about
your work?
What could possibly be better than being a paleontologist in the
National Park Service? America’s parks include Yellowstone, the
Grand Canyon, Yosemite, Olympic, and 350 other spectacular wonderlands,
most of which have some fossil deposits — some of the best on the
Earth, like the ones where I work. We preserve the fossils on public
lands, provide opportunities for the public to appreciate them, and at
the same time, engage in lots of original research. There are so many
different tasks that I get to do at the National Parks —
it’s rarely the same thing from day to day.
![]() With Skylar Rickabaugh in Ipolytamoc National Park at the invitation of the Minister of the Interior, Hungary, examining and sampling the Miocene “Miraculous Tuff” for correlation. Photo courtesy of Ted Fremd. |
I also enjoy working with the handful of other Science Advisors in the Service, collaborating on a wide variety of issues affecting the National Parks, such as global climate change. Coming from different disciplines, the other scientists appreciate the “Deep Time” perspective that paleontology can bring to the understanding of modern ecosystems.
It’s so wonderful to be paid to do what you like, and I am so happy to be one of the fortunate people who get to do just that. As if that isn’t enough, one extra perk is that I have fossil species named in my honor! Right now I have three fossils named for me — a Paleocene primate (Micromomys fremdi), an Eocene artiodactyl (Achaenodon fremdi), and an Oligocene rose (Rubus fremdi). It’s always fun to be at the right place at the right time and discover an exciting new specimen, and having one named after you is a great bonus.
What is the most difficult part of your job? What bugs you most
about your work?
Administrative tasks; they are necessary and not particularly difficult,
but they’re simply not much fun to do. Also, there are a lot of
rules where I work, and following rules that you don’t always
agree with can be frustrating. That’s probably true anywhere
though, and I am still very lucky to have a job where I get to do such
fun things most of the time — it makes the paperwork and
rule-following worth it!
![]() Working with new specimens in the collections. Photo courtesy of Ted Fremd. |
What has been your most exciting discovery?
After almost 35 continuous years of fieldwork, there have been many.
I’ve discovered complete skulls of organisms previously known only
from fragments, entirely new major localities, taphonomically bizarre
remains, the list goes on and on.
If you could find the answer to any one question in science, what
would it be?
Hmmm …. Crudely put, I guess it would be: are there other thinking
beings in the universe, and where are we going with this? Or, as George
Carlin asked, “Where are we going? And what’s with this
handbasket?” That’s an old joke, kids — if you
don’t get it, it’s okay.
What is your favorite fossil and why?
At the moment it has to be the little fossil from Nunavut, Canada that
was just discovered in the last couple of years — Tiktaalik
rosea. It is a perfect example of an organism whose existence was
predicted by science many years before it was ever discovered.
Tikaalik is a transitional fossil. This means that it fills in
a gap that existed in the fossil record. In this case, the fossil has
characteristics of both fish and early amphibians. The critter has a
shoulder, elbow, and wrist like an amphibian, but fish-like fins instead
of toes. Its ears are also somewhere between a fish and an amphibian.
Evolutionary theory predicts that there should be transitional organisms
like this in the fossil record, but they’re very rare. When one is
found, it’s always hugely exciting! Other than that, I guess
I’m partial to caniform and feliform carnivores — extinct
dog-like and cat-like creatures.
![]() With colleagues at the first John Day Basin paleontology symposium convened at the North American Paleontology Convention. Ted is second from the left, back row. Photo courtesy of Ted Fremd. |
Whom do you admire most in science or the world at large?
The Dalai Lama is a wonderful example of a world leader who isn’t
afraid of science; who can apply profound insight into the nature of
reality using both spirituality and scientific evidence. In general, in
the world at large, I admire Tibetan Buddhists because some of their
teachings anticipated modern scientific discoveries, to an astonishing
degree, yet were made thousands of years ago. Some of these traditions
include fables of humans evolving from ape-like animals, something
approaching quantum theory, spacetime, and so forth.
Is “evolution” fact?
Darwinian evolution by natural selection has been tested again and
again, and again and again, it has been able to explain results and
predict findings. Things change. That is indeed a fact. And at this
time, natural selection is the testable explanation that best fits the
facts. As an evolutionary biologist, I have a hard time understanding
why some people don’t agree with the science. I can only hope that
one day the subject won’t be as political as it is today, because
the science is really indisputable and when you understand evolution, so
much of the world around you begins to make more sense, look more
beautiful, and become more amazing.
How were you taught about evolution?
The first technical exposure was a graduate course offered by my mentor,
Richard C. Fox, at the University of Alberta. One could not have had a
better instructor.
![]() Surveying for fossils for the NPS Geologic Resources Division. That's the St. Elias Range, Alaska, in the background. Photo courtesy of Ted Fremd. |
How do you use evolution?
I use evolution every day. My colleagues and I display evidence of
evolution in exhibits in the new paleontology center to help people
appreciate nature; I use it daily to interpret the fossil assemblages
spanning 45 million years; and I use it to help me understand the
complex web of ecosystems that make up the thin veneer of the present.
Evolution is at the core of everything I do as a scientist. Without a
working knowledge of how evolution works, things just wouldn’t
make sense.
Can you “see” evolution?
Evidence for it is all around us. Some of my favorite examples are
organisms that coevolved with other species that have since disappeared,
leaving what appear to be “maladapted” populations. Without
knowing the coevolutionary species, the modern forms make little sense.
For example, modern pronghorn (antelope-like animals that live in North
America) seem to run much faster than they need to — in fact, they
are the second fastest land animal after the cheetah. But since there
isn’t a modern predator that runs nearly as fast as they do, why
do they have so much speed? It turns out they coevolved with a large
North American cheetah, now extinct, so when one sees them running one
can almost see them being “chased” by a ghost of predators
past. Likewise, some Costa Rican fruits and nuts produce huge seeded
fruits that aren’t dispersed by any animal, so most of the fruits
rot — not a very effective way of reproducing if you’re a
plant. Scientists think that they look the way they do, however, because
they used to be dispersed by large elephant-like herbivores, called
gomphotheres, that are now long extinct. I think coevolution is the most
interesting aspect of paleontological theory; it affects every organism
on Earth from bacteria to whales. All things are interrelated —
things are the way they are because they changed together over periods
of time.
What message would you send to “future
paleontologists”?
Would the last paleontologist on Earth please lock the specimen
cabinets.
Where can I go to learn more?
To read more about some of Ted’s interests, explore these:
Ask a Question
To ask Ted a question about fossils, or anything else, just click below
and email him your question. If you don’t hear back right away,
please be patient. Remember, he may be off collecting more fossils right
now!